![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
London Met UCU - Statement on Staff Association |
|||||||
|
The following was emailed to all London Met UCU members on 14th March 2007
UCU Statement on Staff Associations Dear all, UCU has been asked to comment on the elections for a Staff Association currently being conducted through Human Resources at London Met. Given the failure of management to consider or engage with staff opinion at any level,we might be expected welcome such a proposal. However, we do not believe that, as currently proposed, it offers a genuine opportunity for the expression of staff views:
London Met management’s attitude to staff representation is also shown in its attitude to the merger of NATFHE and AUT. At first our management did appear to recognise UCU and in that spirit UCU officials and local officers attended meetings in August at ACAS. In the event the ‘talks’ proved to be a total farce. The head of HR failed to turn up and in her absence the PVC (academic) demonstrated no authority to agree or even discuss anything else. Since then London Met management have de facto failed to recognise or engage with UCU officers or officials at any level; this despite, or perhaps because of, the urgency to discuss increasing staff work loads, the use and abuse of hourly paid staff and the position of research staff. UCU has the experience and national base to engage constructively with all these issues with management. London Met could only benefit from such a partnership. However, to date London Met is the only institution in post-16 education not to carry over formal recognition; that fact alone reveals everything about our current management’s commitment to engage in constructive dialogue with its workforce and those who legally represent that work force in higher education. In these circumstances we do not believe that Staff Associations are an expression of this management’s commitment to representative governance. They may indeed be designed with precisely the opposite intent in mind. It looks as if this Staff Association has been established to bypass normal consultation procedures while retaining a figleaf of staff involvement. For all management’s claims, this will be less accurate as representation of staff opinion, less democratic and totally ineffectual. As far as we can see, it will be controlled by management and will be able to achieve nothing. The danger is that it will be used to undermine genuine staff representation. To give one example, staff associations can, in certain circumstances, be used instead of trade unions for consultation over redundancies. Unlike trade unions, representatives on a staff association would have no experience or expertise in this field. Trade union reps do and what is more, they can call on highly experienced and qualified support in their head offices, including legal advice. In the light of all the above, UCU is advising its members to boycott Staff Association and these elections. We should not legitimate this pretence at consultation or allow management to set up sham staff bodies when we have already chosen our representatives. Instead we will be inviting you in future weeks to engage in a campaign to restore union-management engagement at this university. Best wishes, Amanda Sackur Chair, Co-ordinating Committee, London Metropolitan UCU |
|||||||